Page 1 of 1

SME Questionnaire Form - July 21

Publication Target Date: July 21


Submission Deadline: July 18


Article Working Title: The Substation Problem: Distribution, Protection Relays, and Living Inside NERC CIP


Editorial Brief: Transmission and distribution is where cyber risk becomes most directly a public-safety and continuity risk, and where a compliance regime, NERC CIP in North America, shapes nearly every decision. The article should move past CIP as a checklist and examine the operational reality of securing substations and the distribution edge: protection relays and serial-to-Ethernet gateways that were never designed for authentication, the documented history of substation disconnection and loss of view and control in real grid attacks, and the tension between a low-impact classification that limits required controls and a real-world consequence that does not respect the classification. It should be specific about the compliance calendar that operators are living through — internal network security monitoring obligations and tightening remote-access requirements — and honest about the gap between a substation that is CIP-compliant and one that is actually defensible. Distribution utilities, often smaller and less resourced than transmission operators, face the same relay and gateway exposure with a fraction of the staff. The architectural lessons — segmenting field communications, validating relay configurations, knowing how to operate when you lose remote visibility — apply to any operator with geographically dispersed, lightly attended field assets, including pipelines and water.

About you

First Name

Last Name

Company/Organization

Job Title/Designation (to be used in feature)

Business Email

Short Bio

Upload headshot (JPG/PNG up to 5MB; Square 500×500px, 300 DPI recommended)

Question Set

Where is the most significant gap between what NERC CIP requires for substations and what is needed to make them operationally defensible?

How do utilities secure protection relays, serial-to-Ethernet gateways, and other field devices that cannot support modern authentication or routine patching, and which compensating controls have proved most effective?

How are internal network security monitoring and tighter remote-access requirements changing substation security priorities, architectures, and investment decisions?

How should utilities address sites classified as low impact under NERC CIP when their disruption could still create significant operational, safety, or community consequences?

If remote visibility or control of field assets is lost, how does the utility continue operating, and how recently has that scenario been tested under realistic conditions?

What should a practical minimum security model for the distribution edge include when a utility lacks staff and budget for a dedicated OT security team?

Thank you for your response!