Page 1 of 1

SME Questionnaire Form - June 21

Publication Target Date: June 21

Submission Deadline: June 7

Article Working Title: AI adoption in OT security is accelerating faster than governance

Editorial Brief:

Industrial companies are racing to put AI to work in their OT security operations to help spot threats and flag anomalies, manage vulnerabilities and staff virtual SOCs. But a new Takepoint Research survey reveals a striking gap: many organizations are deploying AI across multiple security functions faster than they're building the rules to govern it.

The uncomfortable question that such a gap raises is accountability, mainly who's responsible when an AI system influences a call on the plant floor, and what guardrails exist when something goes wrong in an environment where a bad decision isn't just a data breach; it's a safety event. Critical infrastructure operators tend to have more mature oversight structures, but manufacturers and less-developed industrial sectors are largely still borrowing IT governance frameworks never designed with OT realities in mind, leaving a growing slice of the industry operationally ahead of itself.

About you

First Name

Last Name

Company/Organization

Job Title/Designation (to be used in feature)

Business Email

Short Bio

Upload headshot (JPG/PNG up to 5MB; Square 500×500px, 300 DPI recommended)

Question Set

What signals would tell you that an industrial organization is actually ready to introduce AI into OT security operations?

In your experience, are industrial organizations building governance at the same pace as they are deploying AI-enabled security tools, or is adoption moving ahead of oversight?

What can go wrong when AI tools start influencing OT security decisions before clear oversight, escalation, and accountability models are in place?

Which OT security use cases are organizations most likely to apply AI to first, and what makes those areas attractive?

How should accountability be defined when an AI system contributes to a decision that affects plant operations, safety, or availability?

What controls, review processes, or human-in-the-loop requirements should become standard before AI is allowed to influence higher-consequence OT security decisions?

Thank you for your response!